Genuinely funny
“This is actually genuinely hilarious 😂 I cackled like an asshole more than I expected to.”View comment on YouTube
16 Oct 2026 · 2,765 works · 693 news indexed

Synopsis
Thom Claw, the co-founder of a popular tech platform, boards a flight just as his past catches up with him: embarrassing chat logs from his internet history leak online and turn into a national scandal, and his life, in the words of the maker's own account, detonates in real time at altitude. Trapped in his seat with no way to get ahead of the story, he is already coming apart when he notices who is sitting across the aisle.
It is Raiden, the man who bullied him in high school. From his own seat he torments Thom for the length of the flight, while Thom's girlfriend Millie, in the adjacent seat, is quiet, confident and a schemer who does little to calm things. The cabin becomes a pressure cooker built around cruel jokes and insults, and the film builds toward a raw argument over the accusation "You killed someone."
The tone is a serio-comic thriller, claustrophobic and darkly funny, with a surreal storm sequence at 10,000 feet that its maker likens to a Fellini carnival ride and a skate-park scene. Its themes are a public reckoning for old online behaviour, a bully's hold on the person he once picked on, and a man performing composure while it fails. It is shot in black and white in the old square Academy ratio, with a 1990s indie look.
Last Updated 14 October 2026
Window Seat is a 61-minute black-and-white serio-comic thriller drama released on 21 July 2023, written, directed, edited and produced by the American filmmaker Hooroo Jackson. He billed it as the first feature film made entirely with AI, both picture and performances, a claim that rests on his own press and essays. It was put out free on YouTube and on a pay-what-you-want basis on Gumroad; a 2023 trade piece said formal distribution was being explored, and Jackson's July 2026 essay names no current platform.
By Jackson's account he wrote the script in late 2022 as a live-action screenplay, going through ten to thirty drafts, and made it in 2023 with Runway's Gen-2 video model and ElevenLabs voices. He generated the dialogue first and treated it as a radio play, then built the picture over it from roughly 4,000 clips of about five seconds each, cut in Final Cut Pro. Lines took 25 to 100 takes, which he compared to a slot machine, and lip-sync came from prompting rather than a lip-sync tool. In a 2023 interview he described the dinosaur in a museum scene walking out of the shot and, later, characters whose faces changed shape or whose bodies were cut in half, one of which he kept with a samurai-slice sound. Runway's model changed mid-production, so the look shifts across the film, and ChatGPT helped with some jokes and insults. The ensemble voices came from voice cloning, with a rule that output could not resemble the real source person; Raiden's Irish-sounding voice, he says, was unplanned. He lists the tools in the closing credits and no crew.
Jackson is a filmmaker whose first film, Aimy in a Cage, won the Director's Prize at the 2015 Portland Film Festival, according to SHOOT. He began in June 2023 by recreating the Titan OceanGate implosion entirely with AI, a short that led to calls for a feature. The budget he gives varies: $190 and 23 days of one person's work in the 2023 SHOOT piece, a "hundred-dollar budget" to FilmInk, and $100 or $95 in his 2026 essay, where the $100 is tied to a month of Runway's unlimited plan. He completed the film on 19 July 2023, released it two days later with paid advertising, and says a later revision cut the closing line "Viva la cinema." On YouTube the film had 9,609 views when read on 6 October 2026.
Reception was modest. FilmInk, writing in 2024, said the film "wasn't received with much enthusiasm" and drew online criticism, which Jackson says pushed him toward his next project, DreadClub: Vampire's Verdict. In his 2026 essay he reports that festivals unanimously rejected it, that the AI community largely ignored it, that its trailer was banned from Reddit, and that Letterboxd removed it; these are his claims, not independently confirmed here. The same essay cites a 100% Rotten Tomatoes score from three critics, including a mixed Film Threat review and a three-star review from Ronak Kotecha that called it an uneven experiment.
Its place in the story of AI cinema is mainly as an early marker. The essay frames it as the start of AI feature films and argues that history belongs to whoever documented it, while acknowledging that the "first" claim is disputed on the page itself.
Audience sentiment
Mostly positive: viewers call it hilarious, chaotic and heartfelt, and praise the sound; some find it confusing or nightmarish.
81% positive
Based on 16 comments about the show on YouTube
“This is actually genuinely hilarious 😂 I cackled like an asshole more than I expected to.”View comment on YouTube
“This is beautiful. Its the absolute chaos against noise. Its just, trying so darn hard. I love it.”View comment on YouTube
“Fine Work. Audio was great”View comment on YouTube
“I think it's adorable, the characters are like little lego people.”View comment on YouTube
“Well that was nothing short of horrifying.”View comment on YouTube
“This is probably the most confusing piece of media I've ever witnessed, and then you got 43:10.”View comment on YouTube
Measured 14 October 2026

Image: hooroojackson.com

Image: ytimg.com

Image: ytimg.com

Image: ytimg.com

Image: ytimg.com

Image: ytimg.com
On YouTube